This week was released by the municipality to opposition parties specifications contest municipal dog pound service, the CDL considered "full of errors and shortcomings that make it unfeasible that the service can be performed in minimum conditions of success."
According to the party president, Sergio Benito, "the government team intends to award the service for half the annual cost it had to date and also add cats and other pets"According to Benito, "The specifications should include the obligation to present an economic technical study of the viability of the service, extend the term of concession of the service in such a way as to encourage investments in the facilities and prohibit the slaughter of animals, recognizing it as a right above criteria merely economic. "
It is true Enrique that there are dog owners very disrespectful, but that is not why we have to sacrifice the 12.000 dogs, they can not collect their droppings. By the same rule of three támpoco we have to sacrifice the inhabitants of 'Denia for a citizen who has no feelings towards animals.
Man, I think if the council did not support APAD had not made a new facility that cost more than 200.000 euros.
I repeat, I read you the statement
Thank you very much FRIEND MONTGO, sometimes think about things that are totally unknown, and in this case have always believed it is better to abstain. We will fight these 140 dogs, because each has a name and is a member and volunteer family who are there fighting every day and tirelessly to achieve their welfare. We also have cats and this 20 years 40 have managed to be taken. WE WILL NOT lose heart
I'm up hairs to see shit, I say SHIT puppies, those indecent and undesirable owners (and I'm fine in the adjectives) throughout Denia (porcierto believe that lives off tourism city), for lovers of dogs (12.000 puppies census) DENIA look more for that puppies can spare the 12.000.
I am one of many volunteers from the shelter, those who come to help the dogs in their spare time. I help find adoptive families, I donate food and I am quite dedicated (like and many others) in helping that shelter. I think that for the protetora she needs financial support from the city council, also very important collection of animals. If there will be no financial support, how should help for pick-ups and emergencies (abandoned, lost, run-over dogs, which today is 5 to 12 daily pick-ups and increases on weekends and holidays, rainy days and in summer or I tell you!), also all veterinary expenses, sterilizations, vaccinations, medications, preparations for adoptions, food and ect ... how will we have to move forward and in what conditions more than 130 puppies? Well, that question and it is - where can I go ???? … Protectora needs help from the town hall.
In addition, many who want to help animals, we work voluntarily in our free time, and we bring food and other necessities for dogs, we look for families to adopt them, with nothing in return, because we know that without help it is TOO DIFFICULT AND IMPOSSIBLE, in Denia There are so many abandonments and day by day these 130 puppies have to be fed, and if they are sick they also need veterinary help! Since last summer the protection has improved a lot, all the dogs are vaccinated, dewormed, many sterilized, very clean, in facilities many changes have been made, soil with grabia, so that they are not full of muddy dogs on rainy days, they have been separate parks so that dogs have more time to be loose, more washers and dryers, adoptions have increased and ect ... ect ... The current APAD team works hard! Let it continue like this, and I hope you will have all the necessary support from the Denia city council.
I agree 1000 times that the City Council should give its unconditional support to APAD, a protector that has existed for years, that already has all the facilities, that has a professional team of volunteers, that has very good veteran support, to the place of holding a contest for «A kennel» ... It is a better solution for everyone: 1) Denia does not sacrifice animals, it is a modern and responsible city 2) The City Council gives its support to an existing protector with everything done to save the animals (I repeat again : only a "company" with the name "kennel" euthanizes and can euthanize the animals because it is included in its license!) and not to euthanize due to lack of adopters or whatever ...
In the interest of all support and improve existing thing, experienced, giving real help to the protective and provide a secure future for animals in the city.
PLEASE HAVE REASON TO JOAN. READING THE ARTICLE ME I HAVE READ THE SPECIFICATION AND NOTHING NIINGUN SITE PUTS SACRIFIO OF ANIMALES.ESTARIA well we we reported before posting NADA.
Dear Sirs:
Read your writings I will try to answer in the best possible way so that it is understandable and I speak from the in-depth knowledge of the subject, because I am voluntary every day of the week from 4 to 8 in the afternoon doing all the necessary tasks in the protective, with the only personal compensation that the dogs give me.
I say you have to talk to sanity and so I do, but not from ignorance that I think there is about it, and not that I want to say ignorant because that is not my motto, mainly because I consider the ma ignorant person the world but ready to learn every day.
The word protector means that you protect yourself, take care of all aspects of the animal and feed yourself, all with a contribution from the City Council (which is rather small and late) and the help of many people who collaborate so much with their work disinterested as providing food, medication or economic. For that is called it.
The word kennel means picking up an animal or taken by someone, you will have a waiting period if its owner claims it, (total 10 days) and if no one usually calls is sacrificed, as budgets are so few not allowed to go storing animals.
The difference is abysmal. I invite you to visit any kennel that you have near you and after you go through our shelter and you will see at a glance the difference between one thing and the other-
The economic example is also very easy: Those who work today can earn 700 euros per month and at the end of the year they are 14.000.euros. In the case of two people, they would be 28.000.00 euros, right? We are talking about two people. Well now apply a budget of 30.000.00 euros a year for 140 dogs and 20 cats, and with this they try to cover food, vaccines, pipettes for disinfection and veterinary costs. It is not that Vdes are a kind of magicians, please provide me the formula ..
A cordial greeting waiting for my simple examples enabling them to learn more in depth on this subject, which I see you have an absolute ignorance ..
Maria and Juan,
The word "kennel" has its legal meaning on the Valencian Community law (and others). "Municipal kennel" on these laws also has its legal status. If the city council wants to do the works or change the existing protector, it is necessary to keep the word "protector", each nomination has its legal meaning. It is like "a fee" and "a tax", we cannot confuse, but they both go in the same direction - pay a contribution to the state or administration.
Important rectification: as of today in Denia there is the protective APAD and not "municipal kennel". And today, when there is a very strong movement in many municipalities to close the "municipal kennels" and leave the protective ones, when there are demonstrations to prohibit the existence of the kennels as they are, here we are talking about a contest for "municipal kennels". And that is worrisome. The Valencian Community law sets the rules and regulations for municipal kennels, which allows a sacrifice if an animal is not "necessary". Protectors or shelters do not fall under this law, they cannot sacrifice and they do not.
http://www.denia.es/es/servicios/contratacion/anunci.aspx?id=174
Please read the specification because nowhere puts no animal sacrifice. It will remain an animal shelter forever. but the council would not have spent the money on new facilities. Please read before speaking.
I think nobody has talked about killing the dogs. In fact, only it needed to see as they were before and as they are now, after the work conducted by the council. If you do not interest them, they would not.
Please, a little sanity in this and read the sheet well.
To all those who have dogs and cats, who want animals know that they are part of our families, DO NOT let that happen, this city needs a PROTECTOR as it is right now, no kennel (kennels should never exist! municipalities can allow "killing with full hands") if there are so many abandonments of dogs and cats ... I believe in the municipality of DENIA, and with all my heart I hope that they will not be cruel deciding: "we are going to kill the dogs" or "we save and give opportunity to be part of a new family »….
I am ashamed GREATLY LIVING IN A CITY WHERE ARE PRIORITIES IN WHICH TONTERIAS INVEST MONEY COURSE FOR SOMEONE benefit from it. NOT WHAT WILL THE SIDE TO THE BICYCLE LANE IN THE AREA PEDRERA, AND THE TRUTH IS THAT STILL HAVE NOT SEEN A CYCLIST PASSING BY, BUT THAT IS SEEN AND ANY COMPANY RECEIVES Emoluments, IS NEITHER OF SERVING FILLING parterres of trees GLITTERSTONES (very cute), but I guess SOMEONE will also HAND AT THE SAME TIME ME are unnecessary WOODEN hAMMOCKS PUT BY THE pROMENADE, but someone would sell. AND THUS AN ENDLESS EXPENSE UNNECESSARY BUT CLEAR THIS IS SEEN AND ANIMALS NOT PROTEST AND HAVE TO SUFFER FIRST Dropouts OF THEIR OWNERS AND CONVICTED WHILE NOT ADOPT A behind bars, well, now SCALP food, WILL unvaccinated, fILLED WITH FLEA AND TICK And if they need a veterinary visit, as close our eyes and peace. WHETHER OR BE FORGOTTEN AS PREVIOUSLY ABADONADOS And in a prison, which is what had once IN THE KENNEL NOT CURRENTLY AS PROTECTIVE ..
Yuck political and CHORIZOS, THIS COUNTRY HAS NOT IMPROVE ALL THAT WHILE PLEBE inept.
Hmmmm… but I don't understand anything! There are 10 days I was letting go of joy for a signing agreement with Aldea Felina and 7500 to help the poor abandoned kittens… and now this one? Is there any logic? Or does the government function in disarray and without communication? And the last: the kennel should not exist in Denia! The protector yes, but the kennel - a machine to kill animals NO! And do a contest, who goes to the animals for a lower price ... What a shame !!!!!! PS I do not know, if that is going to be published, but I want to explain, how the kennels work. The kennel receives the money (public, of course, money from the citizens), and must keep the animals in correct conditions, look for the families etc. What's going on? They kill them and thus save money ... That is why the kennel, however, should not exist in Denia! The prohibition of slaughter of animals should be a first and final point.