OPINION. It is clear that the recommendations of the IMF are aimed at the defense and growth of the banking sector and that to enhance private pension plans, the cake that banks want to distribute to capitalize in the long term, it is necessary that public pensions do not cover the basic needs of pensioners.
Remember the words of its General Director Christine Lagarde "The elderly live too long and that is a risk to the global economy. We have to do something now "
And it was not about building a nursing home in each town. That would at least reduce the problem of unemployment during construction and then with the services provided.
Luckily, the current government seems that it will not follow the IMF's recommendations and draws its own conclusions and is supposed to have another view of the problem that allows it to adopt other measures.
If they have forced us to contribute to this retirement system, they are obliged to pay us the corresponding retirement when we meet the conditions.
SO WE CAN ENSURE THAT PENSIONS ARE WILL BE A GUARANTEE
Another thing is the amount that corresponds to charge that in retirement is determined by the contributions we have made with our contributions and the contributions made by the employer mandatory to have us insured.
So if workers do not fight for their rights today at work they will be left with a retirement of misery
THE PENSIONERS ALREADY HAVE THE PENSION
WE ARE FIGHTING FOR US AND FOR THE FUTURE OF TOD @ S
THE 2º AND 4º MONDAYS OF EACH MONTH IN THE PZA. OF THE TOWNHALL
